<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Icerocket blog search: tag:&quot;April Deconick&quot;</title>
<link>http://blogs.icerocket.com/search?q=tag%3A%22April+Deconick%22</link>
<description>Blogs Search from IceRocket.com</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, IceRocket.com</copyright>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Orality, the “Kernel,” Accretions, and Dating Thomas (Part II)]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[Today my reflections on this topic are guided by the following paragraph from DeConick’s Recovering . She writes We must suspend the processes of composition familiar to our own literate minds and try to enter into a process that makes sense within the ancient world where orality was not only the do <b>...</b> ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://pejeiesous.com/2009/12/04/orality-the-%e2%80%9ckernel%e2%80%9d-accretions-and-dating-thomas-part-ii/]]></link>
 <pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:45:00 CST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b4ec17d5f101e37be8005bdd2acf5623]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Peje Iesous</dc:creator>
 <source url="http://christopherwskinner.wordpress.com">Peje Iesous</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Go Where The Evidence Leads...But Don't Let It Lead You THERE!]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[Following up on my post about the Bible, scholarship, and a recent blog post by Dan Wallace about liberal openness as a "myth," Doug Mangum offers a post that highlights the tension between Dan's motto ("go where the evidence leads") and the penchant for heresy trials and excommunications at conserv <b>...</b> ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com/2009/12/go-where-evidence-leadsbut-dont-let-it.html]]></link>
 <pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:42:00 CST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[16bb3ebbb8f46f6e15a1465e6d653981]]></guid>
 <dc:creator> (James F. McGrath)</dc:creator>
 <source url="http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com/">Exploring Our Matrix</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Orality, the “Kernel,” Accretions, and Dating Thomas (Part I)]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[It may be a little premature, but I believe I am dangerously close to “drinking the Kool-Aid” on this one. While I have expressed some disagreements with April DeConick over the John- Thomas issue both on this blog and in print, I still find her work immensely helpful for my own research on the Gosp <b>...</b> ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://pejeiesous.com/2009/12/02/orality-the-kernel-accretions-and-dating-thomas-part-i/]]></link>
 <pubDate>Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:47:00 CST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[67781d5ca9223c8c96d7027f043c7a62]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Peje Iesous</dc:creator>
 <source url="http://christopherwskinner.wordpress.com">Peje Iesous</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[April DeConick’s New Edited Volume (At a Discount!)]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[April DeConick announced today that her new edited volume, The Codex Judas Papers, will be out shortly. She managed to secure a 25% discount from Brill for her blog readers, so head on over and become one so you can find out how to snag that deal. ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/april-deconicks-new-edited-volume-at-a-discount/]]></link>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:03:00 CST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a16dafba31d05e2eb71130fc6810d923]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Daniel O. McClellan</dc:creator>
 <source url="http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com">Daniel O. McClellan</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[DeConick Clarifies Concerning Methodologies]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[April DeConick posted yesterday her “Ten Commandments” of historico-critical interpretation. Part of her post was meant to address the incompatibility of historico-critical methodology and what she calls “confessional” scholarship (I use “devotional” or “faith-based”). I thought the list made a lot  <b>...</b> ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/deconick-clarifies-concerning-methodologies/]]></link>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:34:00 CDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[ac0a21dde20b5053f6c126b0ccb17592]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Daniel O. McClellan</dc:creator>
 <source url="http://danielomcclellan.wordpress.com">Daniel O. McClellan</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[I don't think this is a conference April DeConick would love]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[April 7-9, 2010 : International Conference : Resurrection of the Dead. Biblical Traditions in Dialogue [ Via] ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://ricchuiti.blogspot.com/2009/09/i-dont-think-this-is-conference-april.html]]></link>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:55:00 CDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[4b44e93e2456645bbfb0de5aa617c235]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Tim Ricchuiti </dc:creator>
 <source url="http://ricchuiti.blogspot.com/">if i were a bell, i&#039;d ring.</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Theology or History]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[What's a biblical scholar to do? April DeConick has posted a couple thoughts over the last few days on proper historical scholarship, and what that looks like in opposition to "confessional" scholarship: There is a big difference between confessional scholarship and its working assumptions and histo <b>...</b> ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://ricchuiti.blogspot.com/2009/09/theology-or-history.html]]></link>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:15:00 CDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[681f7c8237bd49565abd4b21ca6b19c2]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Tim Ricchuiti </dc:creator>
 <source url="http://ricchuiti.blogspot.com/">if i were a bell, i&#039;d ring.</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[The Epic of Gilgawest: A Myth of Biblioblog Origins]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[In the beginning, there was Jim Davila. And the blogosphere was formless and void, and NT Wrong was fishing [NOTE: some manuscripts provide a different spelling here] in the darkness. And while Jim was still contemplating what to call that which he was about to inaugurate, Mark Goodacre said "Let th <b>...</b> ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com/2009/09/epic-of-gilgawest-myth-of-biblioblog.html]]></link>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:45:00 CDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a4456035ef714963d9c1ddd95cde1e16]]></guid>
 <dc:creator> (James F. McGrath)</dc:creator>
 <source url="http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com/">Exploring Our Matrix</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Brenda Adds Her Two Cents]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[Brenda Heyink has decided to chime in and add her two cents, assessing my argument and the overall point being made by Deconick. ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://kashow.wordpress.com/2009/09/10/brenda-adds-her-two-cents/]]></link>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:44:00 CDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[2670b87feb6547c85d0f0df4b3e0025b]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Rob Kashow</dc:creator>
 <source url="http://kashow.wordpress.com">Tolle Lege!</source>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[That's quite a steering committee you've got there]]></title>
 <description><![CDATA[More news on the SBL/Biblioblog union: The following persons will be serving as the ‘Steering Committee’ for the Biblioblog Program Unit: April DeConick Mark Goodacre Stephanie Fisher Robert CargillMany thanks to Jim West and whomever's he got working with him for working on this. ]]></description>
 <link><![CDATA[http://ricchuiti.blogspot.com/2009/09/thats-quite-steering-committee-youve.html]]></link>
 <pubDate>Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:16:00 CDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b9f14bb76f7b366e05a7c67a340b64b7]]></guid>
 <dc:creator>Tim Ricchuiti </dc:creator>
 <source url="http://ricchuiti.blogspot.com/">if i were a bell, i&#039;d ring.</source>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>


